Exercise Calorie Calculator

Pick an activity and enter your weight and duration to get total calories burned, the net amount above resting, and how the other activities compare. The result is a rough estimate for general information, not medical advice.

What is a MET value?

MET stands for Metabolic Equivalent of Task. It tells you how many times more energy an activity uses than sitting quietly at rest. One MET is defined from resting oxygen uptake, about 3.5 mL of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute, which works out to roughly 1 kcal per kilogram of body weight per hour. An activity rated at 8.3 METs, like the running used here, therefore costs about 8.3 times as much energy as sitting still, and yoga at 2.5 costs about two and a half times as much. Published MET values are collected in the Compendium of Physical Activities, and the numbers on this page are representative mid-range values taken from that kind of listing. Most activities have several entries depending on speed and effort, so each value here is an assumption for a moderate version of the activity. Freestyle swimming, for example, spans a wide range from easy to vigorous laps, and 8.3 is a rough middle figure.

The formula, step by step

Calories burned (kcal) = MET x body weight (kg) x time (hours)

The time must be in hours, not minutes: 30 minutes is 0.5 hours and 45 minutes is 0.75 hours.

Total burn versus net burn

The formula gives the total energy spent during the activity. That total includes the energy your body would have used anyway if you had sat on the sofa, which is 1 MET. To see only what the exercise added, subtract it: net calories = (MET - 1) x weight x hours. For the 65 kg runner above, the total is 270 kcal, but the net is (8.3 - 1) x 65 x 0.5 = 237.25, about 237 kcal. The gap matters most for low-intensity activities, where the resting portion is a bigger share of the total. If you are comparing a workout with a snack, the net figure is the more honest one, and it is shown in the result as "Net above resting".

Calories for 30 minutes by body weight

The table below was calculated at build time with MET x weight x 0.5 hours. All values are total kcal.

ActivityMET50 kg60 kg70 kg80 kg90 kg
Walking (moderate pace)3.588105123140158
Running (8 km/h)8.3208249291332374
Cycling6.8170204238272306
Swimming (freestyle)8.3208249291332374
Yoga2.5637588100113
Weight training3.588105123140158
Basketball6.5163195228260293
Soccer7175210245280315
Jump rope11275330385440495
Hiking6150180210240270

In order of intensity, Jump rope, Running (8 km/h), Swimming (freestyle) lead the list, and Weight training and Yoga sit at the bottom. A low MET does not mean an activity is pointless. Gentle activities are easier to keep up for long stretches, carry a lower injury risk, and across a whole week can add up to more than a hard workout you only manage once. One kilogram is about 2.2 pounds, so if you know your weight in pounds, divide by 2.2046 before entering it.

Why this estimate can be off

How to read the body fat equivalent

A common rule of thumb says a kilogram of body fat holds about 7,700 kcal, and the "body fat equivalent" chip uses the same figure. On that basis, a 65 kg person running for 30 minutes (about 270 kcal) would need roughly 28 to 29 such sessions to burn the energy of one kilogram of fat. Real weight changes depend on food intake, water, muscle changes and metabolic adaptation, so they rarely match this simple conversion. Exercise on its own tends to produce smaller changes than people expect, and it works best together with changes in eating habits.

More time or more intensity?

There are many ways to spend 270 kcal for a 65 kg person. Running (MET 8.3) takes 30 minutes, while walking (MET 3.5) needs 270 / (3.5 x 65), about 1.19 hours or 71 minutes. If you are short of time, raising intensity is more efficient. If your joints or fitness limit you, adding time is safer. Beginners are generally advised to build up weekly time first and then increase intensity gradually, because a sudden jump in intensity raises injury risk. The World Health Organization recommends that adults do at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week, and this calculator gives a feel for what that means in calories. A 65 kg person walking 150 minutes per week uses 3.5 x 65 x 2.5, about 569 kcal.

When not to rely on this calculator

How to use the result

Important notice

The results are rough estimates based on average MET values, for general information only. They are not medical advice. If you have health concerns or are starting a new exercise program, talk to a qualified professional. What you enter is calculated in your browser and is not sent to a server.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do different people burn different calories doing the same exercise?

Because the MET formula scales with body weight, a heavier person is calculated to burn more doing the same activity for the same time. That matches reality, since moving more mass takes more energy. Fitness, skill and body composition add further differences.

Does the MET value change with intensity?

Yes. The same activity can have very different MET values at different speeds and efforts. This tool uses one representative value, so if you worked much easier or harder, the true burn is lower or higher than shown.

Should I use total or net calories?

Use net if you want to know what the exercise added on top of what you would have burned anyway. Total includes your resting energy. When comparing with food, net avoids overestimating.

Why is the MET for weight training so low?

The value is an average that includes rests between sets. If you rest less and work large muscle groups continuously, the real intensity is higher. In that case enter only the time you were actually moving.

Should I include warm-up and rest time?

Enter only the time at the selected intensity. If the warm-up was easy walking, calculate it separately as walking and add the two results.

If I eat back the calories I burned, will my weight stay the same?

In theory, equal intake and burn means balance, but exercise estimates have error and appetite often rises afterwards. Tracking your weight over two weeks or more and adjusting is more reliable than relying on this number alone.